Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Marry Him?

After finishing her book, I googled "Lori Gottlieb" to find more material on her, and I discovered that she wrote a book ten years ago called Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough.

Uh-oh. 

My advice is this: Settle! That’s right. Don’t worry about passion or intense connection. Don’t nix a guy based on his annoying habit of yelling “Bravo!” in movie theaters. Overlook his halitosis or abysmal sense of aesthetics. Because if you want to have the infrastructure in place to have a family, settling is the way to go. Based on my observations, in fact, settling will probably make you happier in the long run, since many of those who marry with great expectations become more disillusioned with each passing year. (It’s hard to maintain that level of zing when the conversation morphs into discussions about who’s changing the diapers or balancing the checkbook.)
Et tu, Lori? 

Reading on, I realized the issue is based on what "settling" actually means. I can't quite relate to this, because I'm actually a very boring person who just wanted to set up house and I was on the search for someone to set up the house with. Note, it was easier said than done. 

She's making the claim that a steady, reliable guy who will be a hands-on father and care about your feelings are a dime a dozen, and women primarily search for the sweep-me-off-my-feet dashing cool dudes who will only divorce them for younger models. Generalization much?

I came across this article in Jezebel magazine from earlier this year rehashing Gottlieb's book. The author, Tracy Clark-Flory, is annoyed how women are broadly painted with the "unrealistic expectations" brush, "Meanwhile, men come under no meaningful critique for superficiality or entitlement in the realm of sex and romance. They are largely the sane observers of women’s irrational whims." 

Gottlieb considers herself guilty of "unrealistic expectations." She ended up becoming a mother via sperm donor as she had no man on the horizon. Spoiler, her most recent book, published nearly a decade later, opens with her boyfriend breaking up with her when she thought he was "The One." It makes me wonder if she believed that if she was willing to try hard enough then a relationship would work. But it takes two to tango, and don't we know that. 

However, Clark-Flory does note that the publishers insisted on this eye-catching title, while Gottlieb's point was more about prioritizing character in a life partner as opposed to his looks. 

Clark-Flory had broken up with her lovely boyfriend when she was 26 because she wasn't ready for a forever commitment. She had fretted if she had made the right decision, and did end up marrying later on. But she concludes: 
Now that we’re here, many of us have realized, if we hadn’t long ago, that marriage isn’t a guarantee of happiness, it doesn’t automatically secure an equal partnership in parenting, and it’s often only a temporary state.
More to the point: no predictive storyline emerged around pickiness or settling, because there are no rules to this game. An individual woman’s marital status at any point in time is often chiefly representative of the unpredictable lives many of us are now allowed to live.
THERE ARE NO RULES! I really thought I was not being picky about dating (even though people said I was). I went out with guys who did not fit my criteria. And it didn't go anywhere until Han came along, who, I might add, had also been accused of being "picky."

I was not looking for Brad Pitt. Other single women I know of were/are not looking for Brad Pitt. But they still had a tough time. Because finding the right partner is not always easy, nothing to do with "settling." 

A woman may find her Brad Pitt immediately, and happily spend the rest of her life gazing at his pretty face. A man may be "searching for a heart of gold," but he's "growing old." Finding the right person, for anyone, no matter what the criteria might be, is not always a simple matter "reasonable criteria." Sometimes it doesn't work, no matter how much compromise is on the table.

3 comments:

  1. I never trust a self help book where the author claims to have "the" answer that she is eager to spread in order to enlighten the unenlightened masses, all for the price of a $20 book. But I'm not a big believer in relationship advice "fads" either.

    I find it ironic that frum "coaches" "mentors" etc always fall for the latest one being buzzed about, tout it to kingdom come, just until the next car comes along. There's been let's see, Men Are From Mars, Laura Doyle, 5 Love Languages, in addition to Loi Gottleib, and probably a couple more I am forgetting, in just the past decade. I will admit I've never read these books in full, but I've picked them up in book stores or libraries and read many excerpts and summaries. At best, they do no harm, at worst, they get people desperate for help to get stuck even deeper in their problem, because the serious help they need goes way beyond what these books preach as a lifestyle.

    One self help book that I did find interesting and pretty accurate was by Sara Eckel, I don't recall the title. But it gave some pretty serious thought to singles and was mostly pretty on the mark. It didn't really give lifestyle advice, though. Just gave a lot of real life anecdotes to explain her philosophy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well put! How can one format of advice apply to the entirety of the population? It makes no sense.

    I googled Sara Eckel based on your recommendation. It was called "It’s Not You: 27 (Wrong) Reasons You’re Single." I definitely want to read it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's worth a read. Would love to hear your take on it.

    ReplyDelete