When I was a kid, I was a sucker for romance. I just wanted everyone (characters in books, tv shows, movies) to pair off and ride into the sunset.
But I've become a romance grinch—or, more accurately, a romance critic. I've become particular about my happily ever afters.
I recently read a book (I shan't give the name, since I'm pretty much going to give everything away) and I was actually happy with the atypical ending.
Our heroine, all of 22, has a boyfriend—who she cannot believe actually wants her. She's middle-class and bore the ire of high school bullies; he's a WASP who "summers." She finds out he cheated on her, and breaks up with him. She takes up with another man, albeit a lovely one, as a rebound. The boyfriend, however, wants her back, and even proposes. She struggles a bit with what to do, but declines his offer knowing that she can never trust him again. The rebound breaks up with her too, as a new development in his life requires it.
Our heroine walks off into the sunset, alone.
I was delighted.
As the book drew towards the end, I was puzzled. Chick lit usually has neat, coupled endings, so I was wondering where this one was going.
The character's mother repeatedly tells her that she's young, she doesn't have to settle down yet. She doesn't have to choose now just because someone wants her, and she thinks no one else will.
For our heroine, I wanted her to be with the right guy for the right reasons. The rebound, while a nice chap, wasn't
As Fay says in Jewish Matchmaking (I'm paraphrasing), "When I was 24, I thought it would be the end of the world to be single at 28. Now that I'm 28, I see . . . it's not the end of the world."
From personal experience, I can say that it's worth it to wait for the right relationship, when you're in it for all the right reasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment